Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Nikolas Kokovlis / NurPhoto / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
fund-raise
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
privateness
Robotics
Security
societal
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
issue
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
Wikimedia Foundation , the nonprofit organisation that operates Wikipedia , said on Thursday that the house has n’t received an official placard from the Indian regime over alleged concentrated editorial control and persistent complaint about bias and inaccuracies on the platform .
A number of electric outlet , including TechCrunch , report on Tuesday that the Indian Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had questioned the encyclopedia ’s intermediary status that ’s offered to tech platforms in India .
A Wikimedia spokesperson denied receiving an official notice from the Amerindic government in the last two days and read the foundation “ stands behind its community of volunteers and core note value , enabling meg worldwide to get at well - sourced info at no price . ”
The Indian ministry did n’t straightaway respond to a request for remark .
The supposed query from Ministry of Information and Broadcasting follows a contentious case in the Delhi High Court , where judges have described Wikipedia ’s unfastened redaction lineament as “ serious ” and imperil to suspend its operations in India . The court is hearing a defamation fount make for by news federal agency Asian News International , which seeks to identify Wikipedia contributors who allegedly characterized the news way as a “ propaganda puppet ” for India ’s regime .
Justice Navin Chawla had disregard Wikipedia ’s plea for additional time to react due to its lack of physical comportment in India , admonish of initiating scorn minutes against the political program if it failed to comply with orders to disclose user information . “ If you do n’t want to comply with Native American regulation , then do n’t operate on in India , ” the judge posit .
Wikipedia has maintained that its volunteer editors must adhere to its establish policies regarding confirmable content and legal guideline , though this defense has faced increase scrutiny from Native American authorisation come to about the political platform ’s content moderation practices .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Nikhil Pahwa , editor of MediaNama and a prominent voice on engineering science insurance , wonder the legal base of the government ’s move , arguing that India ’s IT jurisprudence determines platform status based on affair rather than the number of editors .
“ you could be a political platform with one exploiter / editor or a billion , ” hewrote on X.
“ Wikipedia volunteer cautiously curate information from honest intelligence sources and other reputable outside publication ; they do n’t add original subject to the site , ” a spokesperson tell TechCrunch . “ This overture ensures that Wikipedia compiles information from believable sources . All author are cited on article varlet , upholding our commitment to transparency . Wikipedia articles are required by its editorial policy to maintain a inert percentage point of view . Volunteers from many backgrounds and political persuasion edit Wikipedia . This model reenforce that Wikipedia article represent a broad view of knowledge on a theme , rather than any one view . ”
The story has been update with Wikimedia ’s comment .
