Topics
Latest
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Smith Collection/Gado / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Smith Collection/Gado / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
fund-raise
widget
game
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
protection
societal
Space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
case
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
get through Us
Tesla wants to pause a federal agency ’s lawsuit against the car manufacturer for racial prejudice against its Black proletarian at its Fremont gathering industrial plant .
The electric vehicle maker , in a filing in San Francisco Union court Monday , accused the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) of speed to register alawsuit in Septemberagainst Tesla as part of a “ toxic interagency competition ” with a California civic rights agency thatsued the automakerfor similar cause last yr .
The EEOC ’s lawsuit alleges that Tesla violated federal jurisprudence by permit far-flung and on-going racial torment of its bootleg employee and subjecting some workers to retaliation for oppose harassment . The EEOC ’s filing details accounts from Black worker enduring casual enjoyment of daub and epithets such as mutant of the N - word , “ monkey , ” “ boy ” and “ black cunt , ” as well as racist graffiti calling for violence against Black people , among other forms of abuse .
The California Civil Rights Department ’s claims against Tesla include similar examples of molestation from Black worker .
Both cases are in nation court and claim that Tesla violated California ’s anti - discrimination jurisprudence . The EEOC ’s lawsuit include a claim that Tesla also broke a Union law banning workplace race favoritism and harassment .
Tesla also faces a purport class action that alleges racial torment register by workers in 2017 .
The EEOC did not immediately react to TechCrunch ’s request for scuttlebutt .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Tesla ’s filing on Monday say the federal court should pass up to spread out a third case until the existing cases are resolved . The auto maker ’s lawyers argued that prosecute three casing simultaneously will involve “ substantial duplication of movement , ” create a risk of “ discrepant court ruling ” and waste judicial imagination .
Tesla is call on something referred to as the Colorado River abstinence ism here , which is a sound principle that would allow a Union lawcourt to abstain from discover a eccentric if there ’s a parallel legal proceeding happen in res publica motor lodge that incubate the same way out . The goal behind the doctrine is to avoid twin litigation and boost more efficient justice .
The turf state of war Tesla refers to in its filing is between the EEOC and the California Civil Rights Department ( CRD ) , formerly the Department of Fair Employment and Housing . The filing claims that , historically , the EEOC and CRD have crop together so that entities would n’t be subject to the same litigation from the two agencies .
“ With each agency increasingly eager to file headline - grabbing complaints and report multimillion dollar mark settlements , their historical coordination and cooperation collapsed , ” the filing states .
Tesla has repeatedly refuse wrongdoing in its multiple case of racial favouritism . In its filing Monday , it bring up to the allegement as “ false ” and accuses the EEOC of “ in haste wrap[ping ] up its pretended pre - suit investigating . ”
The party is also appealing a$3.2 million awardgranted to a Black former contractor at the Fremont works in a disjoined raceway diagonal suit .
