Topics

up-to-the-minute

AI

Amazon

Article image

Image Credits:Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Apps

Biotech & Health

Climate

Cloud Computing

commercialism

Crypto

Enterprise

EVs

Fintech

Fundraising

appliance

Gaming

Google

Government & Policy

Hardware

Instagram

layoff

Media & Entertainment

Meta

Microsoft

Privacy

Robotics

surety

societal

Space

inauguration

TikTok

transit

Venture

More from TechCrunch

Events

Startup Battlefield

StrictlyVC

Podcasts

picture

Partner Content

TechCrunch Brand Studio

Crunchboard

meet Us

Terran Orbital is sue its former CTO , Austin Williams , a little over a calendar month after he and other shareholders publically called for a alteration in party leadership .

Williams was a co - founder of planet design and fabrication company Tyvak Nano - Satellite Systems , which was acquired by Terran Orbital in 2014 , and has since become core to the business . He is one of a handful of senior engineers who drop out in November 2022 ; concord to reportingfrom SpaceNewsat the clip , the trio resigned amid ongoing disagreements between the engineering and manufacturing department on how to meet output prey .

Terran Orbital ’s complaint filed on November 13 alleges that Williams did not provide proper advance notice of expiration per his exercise agreement . The company further allege that his doings acted against the troupe ’s best involvement and with a lack of skillful faith , in breach of his fiduciary duty and in injury to the company . Williams , the charge states , “ acted with oppression , hoax , and malice . ”

The fellowship further states that Williams was “ aided and abet ” by some telephone number of unknown people , which it identifies in the causa as “ [ John ] DOES 1 - 100 . ” Terran will update the complaint “ when the straight identicalness of any DOES are ascertained , ” the suit says .

The courtship against Williams get along a little over a calendar month after he and other investors publicly called on Terran ’s board of directors to make drastic change to fellowship leadership — including by put in a raw chief executive officer in place of Marc Bell and “ reconstituting ” the board . The mathematical group of investor , which holds approximately 8.4 % of the outstanding portion in the fellowship , publically released their letter to the boardcalling for these changes on October 12 . The mathematical group turn down to remark on this tarradiddle .

The group , which admit Tyvak ’s other cobalt - founders Jordi Puig - Suari and Roland Coelho , say in their alphabetic character that the company is “ operate from a position of impuissance due to leadership missteps , deficiency of interior controls , hapless corporate governance , and a loss of public market confidence . ”They cite a reserve worth $ 2.6 billion and the company ’s pitiful stock price — $ 0.81 as of today .

The first letter states that Williams would “ welcome the opportunity to research ” return to the society provided the change are implemented .

Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

The group has sent two more letters ; the third letter was sent on November 9 , just four days before Terran filed its lawsuit against Williams . In it , they reiterate their request to meet with the board to discuss their proposal , including talk about the chief operating officer candidate the group identify to substitute Bell .

“ It is simply impossible that the Board has refused to fill with us and rather has decide to adopt a seemingly hostile and dismissive attitude toward us as shareholders , ” the letter say . “ We conceive such a position only further erodes shareholder value and marketplace assurance in Terran . ”

While the lawsuit will have to be evaluated on its merits , it ’s uncommon for a company to litigate a digress executive a full year later over failing to give equal notice . Observers , such as other shareholders , may reasonably translate the fellowship ’s actions in this context as retaliatory or punitory , regardless of the outcome .

The suit was filed in the Superior Court of California under case routine 30 - 2023 - 01361218 - CU - BC - CJC .