Besides create Exynos 2400 for their Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus , Samsung also pass water theTensor G4 chipfor thePixel 9 serial . Considering both chips are made by Samsung Foundry , you may be curious to make out how they guard up against each other . get ’s pock the Galaxy S24 ( with Exynos 2400 ) and Pixel 9 ( with Tensor G4 ) against each other to compare not only the processor but also to see how the two compact Android flagships perform against each other .
Note : Since the Pixel 9 miss the vapor cool down chamber found in its elder siblings , I ’ve also included scores from the Pixel 9 Pro XL to bring home the bacon a clearer picture of the Tensor G4 ’s potential difference against the Exynos 2400 .
board of Contents
Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400: Specifications
Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400: CPU
The Tensor G4 is an octa - core central processor , down from nine cores on theTensor G3 , as we talked about in the beginning . It has one Cortex - X4 inwardness clocked at 3.1GHz , three Cortex - A720 operation nucleus clocked at 2.6GHz , and four Cortex - A520 efficiency essence clocked at 1.95GHz .
On the other helping hand , the Exynos 2400 is a deca - core ( 10 ) processor . It has one Cortex - X4 core clocked at 3.21GHz , two Cortex - A720 core time at 2.9GHz , two Cortex - A720 cores slightly lower at 2.6GHz , and then four efficiency Cortex - A520 core clocked at 1.95GHz .
The Exynos 2400 has two additional cores . Its prime core is clocked 110MHz eminent , and two of its Cortex - A720 essence are clocked 300MHz higher .
While both chips are base on Samsung ’s 4 nm fabrication , the Exynos 2400 practice enhance 4 nm LPP+ technology and Fan - Out Wafer - horizontal surface Packaging ( FOWLP ) tech for improved thermal management . It ’s unclear whether the Tensor has these features .
AnTuTu Benchmark
In AnTuTu benchmarks , the Exynos 2400 clearly outperforms the Tensor G4 , boasting a roughly 60 % high AnTuTu score . Notice the dispute in CPU scores specifically ; even though our Galaxy S24 got red-hot during the tryout , it scored almost three time the Pixel 9 ’s score .
Geekbench 6 CPU
In Geekbench undivided - Congress of Racial Equality tests , the Tensor G4 closely matches the Exynos 2400 . However , the one on the regular Pixel 9 interim somewhat behind . The Exynos ’s extra meat and higher clock speeds give it a exculpated advantage in multi - core public presentation , scoring about 45 % gamey at 6,224 points .
CPU Throttling Test
In a 15 - second throttling test , the Tensor G4 throttled betimes on , dropping to closely half its carrying out . The Exynos 2400 fared slightly better , maintaining 61 % of its peak on average . It even recoup slightly towards the end and consistently clocked higher GIPS than the Tensor .
Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400: GPU
The Tensor G4 features an Arm Mali - G715 MP7 GPU clocked at 940 Mc . In dividing line , the Exynos 2400 brag a Samsung Xclipse 940 GPU , clock at a higher 1109 MHz and based on AMD ’s powerful RDNA 3 architecture . To test graphic capability , I run a couple of GPU bench mark on the two phones .
Geekbench 6 GPU
In Geekbench GPU tests , the Tensor G4 scored 6,467 point in time in OpenCL and 6,973 point in Vulkan API . On the other hand , the Exynos 2400 scored 17,459 points in OpenCL and 17,792 point in Vulkan , which is nearly three times the scores of the Google Tensor .
The Exynos ’s GPU is the more herculean one here , intend it would comfortably handle graphic - intensive game and tasks like picture editing .
GFXBench
Here , we ’ve play GFXBench on the Tensor G4 and Exynos 2400 , which tests the processor ’ graphic carrying out . Notice the frame pace in each mental testing : the high the figure , the bland the visuals and gameplay . Although Exynos is stronger on paper , the Tensor can also handle any game you throw at it at respectable lifelike configurations .
3D Mark WildLife Stress Test
In 3DMark WildLife Stress Test , the Tensor G4 succumb a constancy score of 68 % , while the S24 ’s Exynos 2400 scored a simple 58.4 % . amazingly , the Exynos 2400 also ran hot than the Tensor G4 .
While both processors are n’t as stable as their Qualcomm counterparts and experience execution magnetic inclination under sustained load , Tensor really does a proficient job here .
Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400: NPU
The Tensor G4 employ third - gen Tensor Processing Unit for nervous processing which is the same as last class ’s Tensor G3 on Pixel 8 . But it does have a newer Gemini Nano model forPixel AI features . On the other helping hand , Exynos 2400 has a 17 K MAC NPU ( 2 - GNPU+2 - SNPU ) .
Geekbench AI
Geekbench AI test the AI functioning of your equipment , specifically center on how well it handle machine eruditeness , deep encyclopedism , and other AI - centric work load . It assess the capability of your gadget ’s CPU , GPU , and NPU in executing AI - have-to doe with computations across different precision levels and a diverseness of AI tasks .
Here ’s how both the Tensor G4 and Exynos 2400 fare in AI - related tasks :
The Exynos 2400 ’s herculean GPU give it an edge in AI task that leverage the GPU , particularly for project requiring lower preciseness ( one-half and quantized ) . The Tensor G4 , on the other hand , establish its strength in NNAPI - accelerated tasks at half - precision , highlighting the effectualness of Google ’s optimisation for its TPU .
Overall , the Exynos 2400 seems to be the more capable AI processor , peculiarly for job that can utilize its GPU . However , the Tensor G4 entertain its solid ground in specific scenarios , demonstrating the potential of Google ’s custom silicon .
Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400: Modem & Connectivity
The Tensor G4 use the Samsung Exynos 5400 modem , which can save a maximum speed of 14.79 Gbps with its NR dual connectivity of both FR1 ( sub6 gigacycle per second ) and FR2 ( mmWave ) bandwidth . It further supports Wi - Fi 7 , Bluetooth 5.3 , and satellite connectivity .
The Exynos 2400 has an integrated 5 G NR modem , which also defend both frequency ranges . It can achieve maximal downlink speeding of up to 9.6 Gbps in FR1 and 12.12 Gbps in FR2 . It supports Wi - Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 — no artificial satellite connectivity here .
In my examination , both phones have had unchanging connectivity . The Pixel 9 has improved a lot compare to its predecessors , and that ’s something I ’m felicitous about .
So Who Is Winning the Race?
So , in this Tensor G4 vs Exynos 2400 face - off , it ’s kinda surprising to see the older Exynos come out on top ! Even though it ’s been around longer , it still boast newer technology , higher clock hurrying , and additional cores that deliver superior carrying into action in bench mark .
Both chips manage with caloric number and can get hot and slow down when you push them heavily , but Exynos handles that a minute better . Tensor G4 does score some point with its fancy Wi - Fi 7 and orbiter connectivity , but overall , Exynos is just the hard chip with better performance and likely a longer life . It ’s not like we can just pluck which chip we want in our phones , but at least we know what we ’re getting into before we purchase .
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs Plus vs Ultra: 5 Reasons…
Galaxy S25 Edge Vs iPhone 17 Air: 5 Reasons Why…
Best Android Smartwatch (April 2025)
Best Processor for Mobile Gaming (May 2025)
Why Apple and Samsung Are Obsessed With Thin Phones
Best Smartwatch for Kids for Every Budget and Use Case…
Best Gaming Handheld Console for Every Budget and Use Case…
Best Nintendo Switch for Your Budget and Use Case (April…
Best Foldable and Flip Phones (March 2025)
14 Best Android Emulator for Every Console (March 2025)
