Topics
former
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Mozilla (file photo)
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Department of Commerce
Crypto
enterprisingness
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
punt
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
event
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
television
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
After fieldinguser backlash over its Modern Terms of Uselast week , Firefox internet browser maker Mozilla has rewrite its insurance policy to address issues around the excessively wide language it had previously used . Critics said the terms incriminate Mozilla was ask users for the right hand to whatever data they input into the internet browser or upload , which some worried would be then sold to advertisers or AI company .
Mozilla said that was not the compositor’s case , note thatthe new termsdidn’t stand for a variety in the means the society used datum . The company also said that the original language update were not “ push back by a desire ” to sell substance abuser data , and that the company ’s ability to use accumulate data was still limited by the right laid out inFirefox ’s Privacy Notice .
Anumberofcriticshadpointedto terminology , such as the followers , in the new terms as a crusade for concern ( stress ours ):
When you upload or remark information through Firefox , you hereby deed over us a nonexclusive , royalty - destitute , worldwide license to use that informationto serve you pilot , experience , and interact with online subject as you indicate with your consumption of Firefox .
Now , Mozilla has rewrite its Terms of Use to “ more clearly reflect the limited telescope of how Mozilla interact with user data , ” Mozilla ’s mathematical product chief Ajit Varma said in anannouncementshared in front of the weekend .
In the update policy , Mozilla clarifies that it ’s asking for user data in monastic order to operate Firefox and that this does not give the company ownership of that data .
Specifically , the new terms state that :
You give Mozilla the rights necessary to operate Firefox . This let in processing your data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice . It also includes a nonexclusive , royalty - devoid , world-wide license for the intention of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox . This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that subject matter .
Mozilla enounce it also removed the reference to the Acceptable Use Policy from its terms , as it was cause confusedness .
The company’sonline Privacy FAQwas update to better excuse legalese , as well .
For representative , Mozilla said it may have removed blanket claims that it never sell substance abuser data because the legal definition of “ sale of data ” is now “ broad and evolving , ” Mozilla ’s blog Emily Post posit .
The fellowship target to the California Consumer Privacy Act ( CCPA ) as an case of why the spoken language was change , noting that the CCPA defines “ sales event ” as the “ marketing , rental , releasing , disclosing , broadcast , make available , transferring , or otherwise communicating orally , in writing , or by electronic or other means , a consumer ’s personal information by [ a ] business to another business or a third company ” in exchange for “ monetary ” or “ other worthful circumstance . ”
Firefox does collect and share some information with its collaborator , Mozilla said , admit data point that helps to power its optional advertising on the New Tab page in the internet browser and for buy at suggestions in the search Browning automatic rifle , which are detailed in itsPrivacy Notice . However , the troupe say that the user information it does plowshare is plunder of in person identifying information and is only divvy up in sum .
user can continue toadjusttheir own information - sharing configurations in the web browser , Mozilla also said .
