ordinarily , AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok can search the World Wide Web and give you quick answers . But if you need in - depth research on a topic , then their capably distinguish feature come in ready to hand — ChatGPT Deep Research and Grok Deep Search . These features do n’t just pull a few spry hunt results . Instead , they disentangle through dozens of sources to provide you with a elaborate report on your query . Today , we will see just how unspoilt Grok ’s Deep Research is when compare to ChatGPT ’s Deep Research AI mannequin .
To discover out , we screen both tools with various prompts . Here are five exercise mental test cases comparing ChatGPT ’s Deep Research and Grok ’s Deep Search .
Table of cognitive content
ChatGPT
1. Shopping Decision
I like to read every critical review on the net before buying a product . So , I gave this prompting to both putz :
Right off the squash racket , you may see a major difference . ChatGPT asks additional questions to better understand my specific needs . In fact , this was the case with all the prompts . This humble feature makes ChatGPT ’s results more tailored and utilitarian liken to the more generic reputation generated by Grok . But let ’s see how much this input impacts the final report from ChatGPT .
The Grok report suggested a listing of choice along with a elaborate mesa . It highlight the Acer Nitro 16 and the 15 - inch MacBook Air with M3 poker chip as good choices . However , I am specifically look for a Windows laptop computer . This issue could have been avoided if Grok had asked for more details upfront . Except for that , the leaning of products it suggested was quite good . In fact , Grok also displayed the integral reasoning process behind its recommendation , which ChatGPT did not put up .
ChatGPT
On the other hand , ChatGPT suggested laptops with bigger screens and Windows laptops with RTX 3060 graphics cards . Though it urge few options , they array with my specific needs . Additionally , it provided more elaborated data about each laptop computer , including the pro and cons .
Winner : ChatGPT , for offering more personalized issue and for its thoroughness and well - rounded position .
2. Research-Based
The premature example was heavily tempt by the additional details provided to ChatGPT . However , this time , I test both tools without giving any extra entropy , using only this prompting :
The best part about Grok is that it provide key insights , bringing up important points from the report , which was quite utile . It also presented a table showcasing how risque light impacts sleep quality , length , efficaciousness , latency , and more .
While Grok showcased the information in a unspoiled layout , ChatGPT bring out real research studies from source likeHarvardandSleepFoundation.org , explicate the research and results more deep rather of just focusing on the conclusions . It also weigh age and other factors when providing the selective information .
Grok’s Report
achiever : ChatGPT for detailed research , Grok for presentation .
3. Travel Suggestions
Next , I asked a question where there is no definitive answer with this prompt :
ChatGPT ask for additional details , like my budget and the type of billet I was looking for . However , I did not provide any further entropy . While offer these details could make ChatGPT ’s report more personalise , I decided to keep the rival fair by not founder superfluous input signal .
In most scenario , Grok typically look more sources and have results faster than ChatGPT . However , for this particular report , both Grok and ChatGPT suggested alike cities and do as well . As common , Grok provided a well - structured table with the metropolis names and theirGPI ( Global Peace Index)scores . It also play up key places to visit in each metropolis and included utile tips for solo travelers .
ChatGPT’s Report
On the other handwriting , ChatGPT offered forgetful paragraphs explaining why each place is considered safe but focused more on the condom aspect rather than specifically addressing solo travelling .
Winner : Both ChatGPT and Grok performed well . Grok stood out for its better anatomical structure and specific nidus on solo travel .
4. Technical Information
To test how well both models handle summarisation , I used this prompt :
After asking for extra details , ChatGPT apace provided a brief list of differences between Wi - Fi 6 and Wi - Fi 7 before starting its inquiry . fundamentally , it offer a summary upfront , with more elaborated selective information loading afterward .
As expect , Grok presented the information in a well - organized mesa , covering everything from thelaunch datetosecurity features , bands , monetary standard , and more .
Left: Grok | Right: ChatGPT
On the other hand , ChatGPT struggled to sire a summary , failing a brace of time before finally producing a event . However , the output was n’t precisely a sum-up . or else , it included long paragraph , the history of both Wi - Fi 6 and Wi - Fi 7 , and focused more on the technologies behind them rather than their real - world applications . While the information was detailed , it was n’t easy to skim through , which defeated the role of a quick sum-up .
Winner : Grok , for delivering the take information in an easy - to - scan , sum-up - favorable format .
5. Detailed Prompt
Until now , the prompts were more generic in nature . However , I also tried detailed prompt with a focal point on particular necessity :
Both report followed the prompt accurately . If this is for a immediate - read online article , blog post , or a world-wide consultation , Grok is better . It is concise , piquant , and easier to digest . If this is for a research paper , bloodless paper , or a deeply analytical opus for an expert hearing , ChatGPT is good . It provides thoroughgoing details , historic linguistic context , and academic citations .
Winner : ChatGPT for a elaborate answer , and Grok for a mere explanation .
Grok’s Report
Final Winner: ChatGPT Deep Research vs Grok Deep Search
In ending , ChatGPT Deep Research and Grok Deep Search both have their strengths . ChatGPT is great if you need detailed , personalized results . It require follow - up enquiry and labor deeply , making it idealistic for research - heavy project and donnish work .
Grok , on the other handwriting , shines with speed and demonstration . It provides well - structure , easy - to - read report and is perfect for quick summaries or when you need selective information fast .
If you desire more tailored and thorough insights , go with ChatGPT . But if you need a quick and clear overview , Grok is a solid choice . Your choice depend on whether you require depth or speed .
ChatGPT’s Report
All Secret And Hidden Commands for Alexa (May 2025)
How to Turn ChatGPT AI Action Figure Into a Video…
7 AI Tools That Research for You: Stop Drowning in…
How to Create ChatGPT Action Figures and Turn Yourself Into…
4 Ways to Use ChatGPT to Generate YouTube Thumbnails –…
ChatGPT Not Generating Ghibli Images? Here’s What to Do
We Put ChatGPT and Gemini’s Image Generators Head-to-Head – Here’s…
How to Turn Ghibli Images Into Videos Using AI for…
We Tested Tens of AI YouTube Thumbnail Makers to Discover…
I Created My Own Apps Using AI — Here’s What…
ChatGPT’s Report
Grok’s Report
Left: Grok | Right: ChatGPT
