Topics
later
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Teka77 / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Image Credits:Teka77 / Getty Images
Cloud Computing
Department of Commerce
Crypto
endeavour
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
appliance
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
seclusion
Robotics
Security
societal
Space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
newssheet
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
reach Us
prompt : What was the bragging nonstarter of the clean-living technical school bubble that erupt over a decade ago ? Was it Solyndra , the innovative solar venire ship’s company that went belly - up in the face of cheap competition ? A123 Systems , the pioneering lithium - ion inauguration that was eventually sold for penny on the dollar to a Chinese auto parts producer ?
Arguably , neither .
No , the actual failure was biofuels , which today still burn in the engines of car and hand truck across the U.S. Corn fermentation alcohol , in particular , was touted as a way to make Job and support American farmers while reducing the carbon emissions of the conveyance sector . It achieve the first two action items , but rigorous enquiry has shown that corn ethanol producesas much or more climate - warming emissionsas just burn off gasolene .
Hydrogen risks repeating the same misapprehension , and the Biden organisation ’s plan for regional hubs is n’t assist .
That ’s not to say that the universe ’s swooning element does n’t have a potentially bright future . Difficult - to - decarburise industry like ammonia and sword are obvious targets , and grow enough H to satiate those sectors could bring the price down to the point where it makes sense to habituate it elsewhere .
But until that happens , there ’s piffling chance of hydrogen becoming as common as gas . Electric fomite ’ school principal start is almost for sure too much to overcome .
Solution in search of a problem?
Transportation is a key part to the $ 7 billion hydrogen hub programme , but it ’s not the sole focus . In that way , the Union governance seems to have learned from the biofuels geological era . It ’s still present , with all but the Heartland hub investigating the matter , but the emphasis is on trucking , merchant marine and aviation , not commuting . Various hubs are going to inquire H ’s program to steel and spyglass output , crude purification , cold - climate space warming , and fertilizer production .
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
That ’s a pile of shots , and one or more of them may bump off the back of the net . But it also might be too many , make hydrogen calculate like a solution in search of a trouble .
And perchance it is . Hydrogen has been the clear fuel of the future for at least 30 year . Hell , I wrote a 7th - grade research paper on the topic . Its deed of conveyance — I kid you not — was “ What to do with substitute fuel , ” with an entire section dedicate to H . We ’re still ask the same interrogation today , and judge by the approach of the hydrogen hub program , it does n’t come along that we ’re any closer to answering it .
Hydrogen has a lot going for it . It burns comparatively cleanly in everything from turbine to cylinder to industrial burner ( though doing so produces a fair amount of NOxpollution ) . And we can employ it to generate zero - discharge electrical energy using electrolysis . We can produce it from natural gas and water system , both of which are plentiful . But no matter how you make hydrogen today , it ’s expensive .
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law ( BIL ) and the Inflation Reduction Act ( IRA ) could help lend price down . The BIL created the regional hydrogen hubs , and the IRA offers a subsidy of $ 3 per kilogram of H in addition to tax credits for which the fuel could characterise . The Leslie Townes Hope is that if atomic number 1 can find food market and reach commercial scale , it will get past its embarrassing adolescence .
Blue hydrogen’s false promise
Yet the H hub computer programme repeats one of the biofuel initiative ’s fundamental mistakes : It prioritizes political points over practical progress .
Take the use of natural throttle at the Appalachian , Gulf Coast and Midwest hubs . The most common way it ’s used to make atomic number 1 , through steam reformation , discharge gobs of carbon dioxide that has to be captured in lodge to restrict for tax credit .
C capture is a well - empathize process , and one raw gas power flora in the U.S. even experimented with it for a few years . But then it was shut down because it was too expensive to run . Plus , methane is n’t the best feedstock for atomic number 1 . When it leaks from wells and word of mouth , it warms the clime 86 times more than an tantamount amount of atomic number 6 dioxide . Those leaks mean that so - shout out blue hydrogen could leave a global warming footprint that’sworse than coal .
It ’s a dramatic parallel of latitude to the corn ethanol programme : A newfangled fuel source is anticipate to reduce carbon paper pollution , but it ends up being worse once the intact life cycle is analyzed in greater point .
So why is it even being considered ? Because like the biofuel computer program , the regional hydrogen hubs have become a political pawn used to pad bequest industriousness and placate the politician beholden to them . Oil and gas welfare because it might find oneself another emptor for methane should countries adjudicate to hold on burning it . Power generator and natural gaseous state utilities gain because they can run it through their existing turbines and pipelines . Natural throttle utilities further benefit because they can sell it to survive customer in the same way : a gas pedal to burn to heat their building .
Yet all of those ignore the fact that hydrogen , when compared with raw gas , both leaks more readily and can imposedifferent stresseson existing pipelines and equipment . Retrofitting natural gas base sounds appealing because it ’s conversant and benefits entrenched industries , not because it ’ll be cheap . It almost certainlywon’t be .
If there ’s a shining spot to the hydrogen hub experiment , it ’s that green hydrogen ( made from renewable magnate ) and pink H ( from atomic exponent ) are finally get a opportunity to bring price down and find suitable markets .
A decarbonized time to come will probably require hydrogen in one industry or another , and the regional hydrogen hubs ’ scattershot approach may yet deport some fruit . The risk , though , is that some of it will be lousy and hazard bollocks the residue .
