Topics

former

AI

Amazon

Article image

Apps

Biotech & Health

Climate

Elon Musk

Cloud Computing

Department of Commerce

Crypto

Enterprise

EVs

Fintech

Fundraising

Gadgets

Gaming

Google

Government & Policy

Hardware

Instagram

Layoffs

Media & Entertainment

Meta

Microsoft

seclusion

Robotics

security measures

Social

Space

Startups

TikTok

conveyance

Venture

More from TechCrunch

Events

Startup Battlefield

StrictlyVC

Podcasts

Videos

Partner Content

TechCrunch Brand Studio

Crunchboard

reach Us

The European Union has deepened the investigation of Elon Musk - owned social meshing , X , that it opened back inDecemberunder the bloc ’s online governance and depicted object moderation rulebook , the Digital Services Act ( DSA ) . reassert rupture of the regime could be expensive for Musk , since enforcers are empowered to issue mulct of up to 6 % of a company ’s ball-shaped annual turnover .

On Wednesday , the Commission pronounce it had air X a stately asking for information ( RFI ) under the DSA , seeking more details about aspects of the ongoing investigation . The investigating is on illegal subject risk of exposure , manipulative design , shortcomings in ads transparency , andplatform data approach for investigator .

The RFI also target some fresh headache , and the EU is asking X about its content moderateness activities and resources in light of its previous Transparency report ( another DSA prerequisite ) . The story revealed X has welt the headcount of its contented moderation team by almost one - fifths ( 20 % ) since the previous report in October 2023 .

The new study also reveal X has reduced lingual reporting of content moderation within the EU from 11 official languages to seven . That ’s a picky bugbear for the Commission , which has raised the issue before inlonger standing efforts pressuring platforms to take on contentedness hurt .

Another fresh EU concern relates to X ’s approaching to generative AI . The Commission say it ’s seek further contingent on “ risk assessments and mitigation measures linked to the wallop of generative AI tools on electoral processes , dissemination of illegal content , and protection of underlying rights . ”

X is regulated as a so - cry very large online political program ( VLOP ) under the DSA , which imply it ’s open to an additional level of rules supervise by the Commission itself . The extra bed requires the fellowship to assess and palliate systemic risks , such as in arena like disinformation .

“ The request for data send today is a further step in an ongoing investigation , ” the EU said in apress release . “ It builds upon the evidence gathering and depth psychology conducted so far , including in relation to X ’s Transparency report published in March 2024 and X ’s replies to premature petition for information , which address , among others , palliation measures for risks join to generative AI . ”

Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

Back in March , the Commission sent a flurry of RFIs to several VLOPs , admit ecstasy , asking for more data on their approaching to handling risks related to the usage of generative AI . The EU is concerned about the role political deepfakes could make for in the approaching election to the European Parliament next month .

The latest RFI to X gives the chopine until May 17 to answer to its questions about contentedness mitigation resource and generative AI . It must get the other request information to the Commission by May 27 .

X did not respond to requests for comment .

During a briefing with journalists last month , a older Commission functionary declined to extend a full update on its investigation with X , but characterized contacts with the ship’s company as “ quite intense . ”

The official also confirm one participating give-and-take topic relate to X ’s Community Notes feature , which crowdsources extra context to display on disputed position . X , under Musk , has framed the characteristic as its primary approach to content moderation . The official added that it ’s unclear whether the companionship ’s approach is sufficiently rich for responding to election risks .