Topics
late
AI
Amazon
Image Credits:Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto / Getty Images
Apps
Biotech & Health
clime
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
go-ahead
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
gismo
Gaming
Government & Policy
computer hardware
layoff
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
startup
TikTok
Transportation
speculation
More from TechCrunch
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
meet Us
The U.S. government wants to shew that Google ’s competitors face overpowering barriers to entree as part of its antimonopoly case against the technical school giant . So it ’s turn to ChaptGPT ’s headland of production , Nick Turley , to testify as a watcher in hope he will help fortify its typeface .
In a landmarkruling last August , a tourist court find out that Google holds a monopoly in hunting . While Google attract this decision , the Department of Justice is now asking the courtyard to decide what penalty it should face , such asspinning off Chromeor a 10 - year Bachelor of Arts in Nursing on releasing any browser app intersection .
To bolster its case , the DOJ has pulled in various Google competitors like OpenAI , Microsoft , and Perplexity . It want specific executive director , like Perplexity ’s Chief Business OfficerDmitry Shevelenko , to bear witness . ( It ’s not open yet whether Shevelenko will do so . Perplexity did n’t respond immediately to a request for comment . )
Recent legal filing confirm that a top executive from OpenAI , Nick Turley , head of product for ChatGPT , will prove as a attestor for the U.S. government ’s case .
“ Mr. Turley is a witness handpicked by Plaintiffs [ the DOJ ] to testify on OpenAI ’s behalf , ” Google ’s lawyer wrote in a January 16legal filing .
“ Mr. Turley is the OpenAI witness who will testify on behalf of the political science at the Evidentiary Hearing,”another filingfrom January 16 reads .
None of the filing pin down incisively when Turley will bear witness . Turley is expected to be asked by the U.S. about “ generative AI ’s relationship with Search Access Points , distribution , barriers to introduction and expansion , and data point sharing,”per the filing . The DOJ has n’t provided details about what it need to ask Turley . ( These are the precise same topics itwants to askPerplexity ’s CBO about . )
Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI
The DOJ use the terminal figure “ search access item ” to refer to products like Google Chrome that multitude habituate to search the web . Notably , in October 2024,ChatGPT launchedits own AI hunting browser app .
To prepare itself for Turley ’s testimonial , Google has subpoenaed OpenAI for documents related to the case . But the two companionship are now in a heated dispute over the extent of grounds OpenAI should provide .
In a effectual filingon January 16 , Google criticise OpenAI for bring on “ stunningly few document . ” OpenAI ’s lawyers provoke back , take note that Google ’s demands for documents from top executives like CEO Sam Altman seem to be a “ Trojan horse intend to hassle OpenAI executives . ”
OpenAI has agreed to share some documents from Turley ’s work data file about OpenAI ’s strategy on AI products , its desegregation of AI into hunt - related mathematical product , and its Microsoft partnership , a letterfrom OpenAI ’s lawyer show .
Google says it needs more documents from more executive , as relying mostly on Turley “ would prejudice Google ” since Turley is a witness “ handpicked ” by the U.S. government , according tothe filing .
Google also want documents from OpenAI that foredate the launching of ChatGPT in November 2022,claimingthese “ may subvert Mr. Turley ’s testimony regarding barriers to entry in a way that post - launch documents would not . ” But OpenAI allege documents that honest-to-god “ can not meaningfully constitute ” the current AI landscape painting .
Both face appear at an dead end and OpenAI has bespeak the tribunal refuse the full scope of Google ’s request evidence .
OpenAI and Google did not reply to requests for comment . The DOJ decline to comment .
