The A18 Pro chipset on iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max competes directly with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 central processor bump in Android flagship smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and OnePlus 12 . It ’s new , build on a 3 nm outgrowth , and promises a stack of carrying out and efficiency . But does it dethrone the 8 Gen 3 ? Let ’s find out in our A18 Pro vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 comparison .
Note : For benchmark comparison , we used an iPhone 16 Pro Max ( 256 GB ) with anA18 Pro chipand a OnePlus 12 ( 512 GB ) with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in gamy - performance mode .
Table of depicted object
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Specifications
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: CPU
The Apple A18 Pro is a hexa - core CPU built on TSMC ’s 3 nm fabrication process . It feature 2x performance cores clocked at up to 4.04 GHz and 4x efficiency cores with clock fastness that are not yet confirmed but are estimated to be around 2.2 gigahertz .
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is built on a slightly former TSMC 4 nm prevarication cognitive process . It is an octa - kernel central processor with one Cortex - X4 Prime Congress of Racial Equality clocked at 3.30 GHz , 3x Cortex - A720 operation heart and soul clocked at 3.3 GHz , 2x Cortex - A720 cores clock at 3.0 GHz , and 2x Cortex - A520 efficiency cores clocked at 2.3 GHz .
The A18 Pro ’s 3 nm process node allows for even smaller transistors , enable more to be packed into the same outer space . This translate to faster operation and also ripe efficiency . Both processors apply the ARMv9.2 - A instruction set , L3 caches , and patronage LPDDR5X memory .
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: GPU
Apple ’s A18 Pro utilise a new 6 - core GPU , boasting a 20 % performance gain over last year ’s A17 Pro GPU . It also support 2x fast hardware ray tracingcompared to A17 Pro . Meanwhile , the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has Adreno 750 GPU that operate at 900MHz .
Both GPUs support hardware - accelerated ray tracing . This allows for enhanced visual naive realism in games and other graphics - intensive coating . You ’ll see extremely exact manifestation on surface like water , metal , or glass , add together another layer of realism to the visuals .
you could see Apple ’s ray trace in action in Resident Evil 4 andother supported AAA games .
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: AnTuTu Benchmark
In the AnTuTu benchmark , the A18 Pro seduce a totality of 1,797,197 points , whereas the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 head with 1,853,881 point . The CPU and GPU scores are almost on equivalence with each other .
However , keep in mind that AnTuTu grievance for Android and iOS are n’t directly corresponding due to disagree test process . debate these stacks as a worldwide reference percentage point .
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Geekbench CPU
In Geekbench 6 CPU tests , you may clearly see the A18 Pro exceed the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 by a immense margin . It mark 3,409 point in single - core and 8,492 in multi - core tests . On the other hand , the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 mark 2,137 and 6,360 head in unmarried - kernel and multi - core test , respectively .
In short , the A18 Pro execute about 59 % better in undivided - center and 33 % sound in multi - core mental test .
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Geekbench GPU
In Geekbench GPU tests , the A18 Pro achieved a total grievance of 32,870 points . Whereas the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 score 14,974 in the OpenCL framework and 16,508 in the Vulkan framework .
Note that the A18 Pro ’s Geekbench GPU score is based on the Metal API , which is Apple ’s proprietary artwork API and is different from Android ’s Vulkan and OpenCL . Between the latter two , Vulkan is view to be a more modern and efficient API .
The A18 Pro ’s Metal score is significantly high than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ’s scores on both Vulkan and OpenCL . This suggest that the A18 Pro probably has a more powerful GPU , but it ’s difficult to quantify the deviation on the nose due to the API disparity .
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Geekbench AI
On paper , the A18 Pro ’s 6 - essence NPU can perform 35 trillion operations per second , while the 8 Gen 3 ’s Hexagon Neural Processing Engine can do 45 trillion operations per second .
The Geekbench AI benchmark tests the Neural Engine , which is the phone ’s machine learning and AI capabilities . The recent 1.1 version added financial backing for the newer TensorFlow Lite and QNN framework for Android , allowing for more comprehensive benchmarking of Android devices ’ ML capability .
Here , we ’re benchmarking the scores of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 with the A18 Pro . In Single Precision , the A18 Pro blows the 8 Gen 3 out of the water by scoring nearly 10 times higher at 4422 points . The Half Precision test bring down the gap , where the A18 Pro scores 32095 head , more than double the 8 Gen 3 ’s 15401 points .
In the quantal score , the A18 Pro , with a score of 44086 , performs 13 % better than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ’s score of 39598 .
Here ’s what individual , one-half , and Quantized Scores mean value :
A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: 3DMark WildLife Extreme Stress Test
3DMark ’s Wild Life Extreme Stress test benchmarks the free burning performance of a gadget ’s GPU ( graphics processing unit ) under with child load for an prolonged full point . While the resultant role can bet heavily on the outside environs and the headphone ’s thermal control and cooling capabilities , here are the results for the iPhone 16 Pro Max and OnePlus 12 .
The iPhone 16 Pro Max ( A18 Pro ) attain the good loop scotch of 3,683 and the small eyelet score of 2,901 , with a stability of 78.8 % . The OnePlus 12 ( with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ) score a good best closed circuit score of 4,639 , followed by a down in the mouth grummet score of 2,743 , but with a less telling stability scotch of 59 % .
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ’s GPU performs better in speedy burst ; however , it is the A18 Pro that nurture the load well and performs consistently over meter . So , you ’ll have an overall better play experience with the A18 Pro .
Conclusion
The A18 Pro intelligibly dominates this compare . It ’s the new microchip , so that ’s not surprising . Geekbench show up it ’s about 60 % faster for individual tasks and 33 % quicker for multitasking liken to the 8 Gen 3 .
Even its free burning graphics public presentation is better than the 8 Gen 3 under clayey use . And though both devices got somewhat live in the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress test , the Apple did better and was much more stable with a eminent peak performance . Apple seems to have a slight edge in heat energy direction , but I ’ll leave behind that to phone design .
Now , the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is already a year - old chip , and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 is arriving soon with powerful Oryon C.P.U. core . And so will MediaTek ’s upgraded Dimensity 9400 chip . Both processors are presumed to outperform the Apple chipping but let ’s waitress and catch .
We ’ve alreadycompared the A18 Pro with the 8 Gen 4 and Dimensity 9400based on their specification and leaked bench mark oodles .
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs Plus vs Ultra: 5 Reasons…
Galaxy S25 Edge Vs iPhone 17 Air: 5 Reasons Why…
Best Android Smartwatch (April 2025)
Best Processor for Mobile Gaming (May 2025)
Why Apple and Samsung Are Obsessed With Thin Phones
Best Smartwatch for Kids for Every Budget and Use Case…
Best Gaming Handheld Console for Every Budget and Use Case…
Best Nintendo Switch for Your Budget and Use Case (April…
Best Foldable and Flip Phones (March 2025)
14 Best Android Emulator for Every Console (March 2025)
